Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpj72JNU/Ex49_GM04

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → DIV(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MINUS(X, Y)
ACTIVE(geq(0, s(Y))) → MARK(false)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
MINUS(X1, mark(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
ACTIVE(div(0, s(Y))) → MARK(0)
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MINUS(X1, active(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → DIV(minus(X, Y), s(Y))
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(geq(X, 0)) → MARK(true)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → GEQ(X, Y)
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
GEQ(active(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
DIV(X1, mark(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
DIV(mark(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
GEQ(mark(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → IF(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → S(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y)))
GEQ(X1, active(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
ACTIVE(minus(0, Y)) → MARK(0)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
GEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MINUS(X, Y)
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → GEQ(X, Y)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → DIV(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MINUS(X, Y)
ACTIVE(geq(0, s(Y))) → MARK(false)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
MINUS(X1, mark(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
ACTIVE(div(0, s(Y))) → MARK(0)
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MINUS(X1, active(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → DIV(minus(X, Y), s(Y))
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(geq(X, 0)) → MARK(true)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → GEQ(X, Y)
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
GEQ(active(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
DIV(X1, mark(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
DIV(mark(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
GEQ(mark(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → IF(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → S(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y)))
GEQ(X1, active(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
ACTIVE(minus(0, Y)) → MARK(0)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
GEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MINUS(X, Y)
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → GEQ(X, Y)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 6 SCCs with 17 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [15] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its argument. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(X1, mark(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(mark(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(X1, mark(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
DIV(mark(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

DIV(X1, active(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
DIV(X1, mark(X2)) → DIV(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
DIV(active(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
DIV(mark(X1), X2) → DIV(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GEQ(X1, active(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(active(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(mark(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GEQ(X1, active(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(active(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
GEQ(mark(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

GEQ(X1, active(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
GEQ(active(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
GEQ(X1, mark(X2)) → GEQ(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
GEQ(mark(X1), X2) → GEQ(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
S(active(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS(X1, active(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(X1, mark(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS(X1, active(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(X1, mark(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

MINUS(X1, active(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
MINUS(mark(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
MINUS(X1, mark(X2)) → MINUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
MINUS(active(X1), X2) → MINUS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1
POL(active(x₁)) = 0
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(false) = 0
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(div(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(false) = 0
POL(geq(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
mark(false) → active(false)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(div(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
ACTIVE(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(geq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
div(x1, x2) = div(x1, x2)
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
mark(x1) = x1
minus(x1, x2) = minus
s(x1) = s(x1)
geq(x1, x2) = geq(x1, x2)
if(x1, x2, x3) = if(x1, x2, x3)
false = false
0 = 0
true = true
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:

[MARK₁, ACTIVE₁] > div₂ > [minus, s₁, geq₂, true] > if₃
[MARK₁, ACTIVE₁] > div₂ > [minus, s₁, geq₂, true] > false
[MARK₁, ACTIVE₁] > div₂ > [minus, s₁, geq₂, true] > 0

Status:

MARK₁: [1]
minus: multiset
if₃: multiset
div₂: [2,1]
true: multiset
geq₂: [1,2]
false: multiset
s₁: multiset
0: multiset
ACTIVE₁: [1]

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
mark(false) → active(false)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(div(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(div(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(minus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(minus(X1, X2))
MARK(geq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(geq(X1, X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
div(x1, x2) = div(x2)
ACTIVE(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = x1
minus(x1, x2) = minus(x1)
geq(x1, x2) = x2
s(x1) = s(x1)
if(x1, x2, x3) = if
active(x1) = x1
0 = 0
true = true
false = false

Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:

[MARK₁, minus₁, s₁] > div₁
[MARK₁, minus₁, s₁] > false
[0, true] > false

Status:

MARK₁: [1]
if: []
minus₁: [1]
true: multiset
div₁: multiset
false: multiset
s₁: [1]
0: multiset

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(minus(X, Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(minus(0, Y)) → mark(0)
active(minus(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(minus(X, Y))
active(geq(X, 0)) → mark(true)
active(geq(0, s(Y))) → mark(false)
active(geq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(geq(X, Y))
active(div(0, s(Y))) → mark(0)
active(div(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(if(geq(X, Y), s(div(minus(X, Y), s(Y))), 0))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(minus(X1, X2)) → active(minus(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(geq(X1, X2)) → active(geq(X1, X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(div(X1, X2)) → active(div(mark(X1), X2))
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
minus(mark(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, mark(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(active(X1), X2) → minus(X1, X2)
minus(X1, active(X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
geq(mark(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, mark(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(active(X1), X2) → geq(X1, X2)
geq(X1, active(X2)) → geq(X1, X2)
div(mark(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, mark(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
div(active(X1), X2) → div(X1, X2)
div(X1, active(X2)) → div(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.